کتاب دانلود مقالاتمقالات لاتین
مقایسه داده های پرسشنامه مبتنی بر وب در مقایسه با چهره به چهره و کاغذ و مداد از طریق دو نظرسنجی بهداشت بلژیک

Comparing web-based versus face-to-face and paper-and-pencil questionnaire data collected through two Belgian health surveys
سال انتشار: a2020
زبان فایل: English
فرمت فایل: pdf
قیمت: 100,000ريال

افزودن به سبد دانلود

DOI: 10.1007/s00038-019-01327-9

Abstract

Objectives

Using the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) questionnaire, a web-based survey was organized alongside a face-to-face (F2F) survey including a paper-and-pencil (P&P) questionnaire for sensitive topics. Associated with these different modes, other design features varied too (e.g., recruitment, incentives, sampling). We assessed whether these whole data collection systems developed around the modes produced equivalent health estimates.

Methods

Data were obtained from two population-based surveys: the EHISWEB (web-administered, n = 1010) and the Belgian Health Interview Survey 2018 (BHIS2018) (interviewer-administered, n = 2748). Logistic regression analyses were used to assess mode system differences while adjusting for socio-demographic differences in the net samples.

Results

For the P&P mode of the BHIS, significant mode system differences were detected for 2 of the 9 health indicators. Among the indicators collected via the F2F mode, 9 of the 18 indicators showed significant differences.

Conclusions

Indicators collected via the web-based and P&P self-administered modes were generally more comparable than indicators collected via the web-based and F2F mode. Furthermore, fewer differences were detected for indicators based on simple and factual questions compared to indicators based on subjective or complex questions.